Your message dated Sun, 4 May 2008 16:48:26 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#479442: vim-runtime contains non-free files
has caused the Debian Bug report #479442,
regarding vim-runtime contains non-free files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
479442: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479442
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: vim
Version: 1:7.1-266+1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
The vim help files that are installed in /usr/share/vim/vim71/doc/ are
licensed under the OPL, (see usr_01.txt for the exact copyright notice)
which is considered non-free according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html.
Best regards,
Meike
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages vim depends on:
ii libacl1 2.2.45-1 Access control list shared library
ii libc6 2.7-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libgpmg1 1.20.3~pre3-3 General Purpose Mouse - shared lib
ii libncurses5 5.6+20080203-1 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii vim-common 1:7.1-266+1 Vi IMproved - Common files
ii vim-runtime 1:7.1-266+1 Vi IMproved - Runtime files
vim recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 10:31:59PM +0200, Meike Reichle wrote:
> The vim help files that are installed in /usr/share/vim/vim71/doc/ are
> licensed under the OPL, (see usr_01.txt for the exact copyright notice)
> which is considered non-free according to
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html.
This has been discussed before[0] and the FTP masters confirmed that Vim's
documentation does meet the DFSG requirements. The documentation is licensed
under the OPL but does not exercise the license options which would make it
non-free.
[0] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=384019
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---