Your message dated Wed, 14 May 2008 11:25:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pnet has been removed from Debian, closing #394764
has caused the Debian Bug report #394764,
regarding pnet: FTBFS on ARM
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
394764: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=394764
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pnet
Version: 0.7.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
Build fails on ARM with
Error: Rn must not overlap other operands -- `swp r3,r4,[r3]'
The error is correct. This is coming from a broken inline assembly
statement. Patch below fixes it.
Paul
--- pnet-0.7.4/libgc/include/private/gc_locks.h.old 2006-10-22 21:24:06
+0100
+++ pnet-0.7.4/libgc/include/private/gc_locks.h 2006-10-22 21:25:57 +0100
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@
* this code will likely need to be updated. */
/* See linuxthreads/sysdeps/arm/pt-machine.h in glibc-2.1 */
__asm__ __volatile__("swp %0, %1, [%2]"
- : "=r"(oldval)
+ : "=&r"(oldval)
: "r"(1), "r"(addr)
: "memory");
return oldval;
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: arm (armv5tejl)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-rc3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.7.4-1+rm
The pnet package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/453457 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Barry deFreese
--- End Message ---
