On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > was heard to say: > > On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > Package: tetex-ucs > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached > > > bounce. The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable > > > IMO, even if it only exists in stable. > > > > Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-) You're looking for > > latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs. > > d'oh, sorry about that. latex, tetex, texlive, ... > > Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this > *does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt). So maybe this is a p.d.o > bug?
http://packages.debian.org/latex-ucs shows Martin Pitt (for etch; in later releases it's a virtual package). http://packages.debian.org/tetex-ucs says "Sorry, your search gave no results". -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
