On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:14:04 +1000, Brendan O'Dea wrote: > > * in the long run it might be an idea to stop building > > libcgi-fast-perl from the perl source package, add Fast.pm to > > libcgi-pm-perl again, and create a dummy transitional package with > > the usual conflicts/provides/replaces dance for libcgi-fast-perl > > from the libcgi-pm-perl source package; Brendan and Niko, what do > > you think about this idea? > For 5.10, I moved the module to the vendor directory which on > reflection was probably a bad idea (debian/rules:233-236). I'd say > that the simplest solution would be to just reverse that decision, > which would allow libcgi-pm-perl to provide a newer version without > the path conflict.
Sounds like a good plan IMO. Just drop us a short note when you make the change, then we can revert libcgi-pm-perl quickly. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian gnu/linux user, admin & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Sting: Bring On The Night/When The Wo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature