On 23/07/08 at 21:34 +0200, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Package: libvrb > > Version: 0.5.1-4 > > Severity: serious > > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080527 qa-ftbfs > > Justification: FTBFS on i386 > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > i386. > > [...] > > > This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3 > > is now the default on most architectures (even if it's not the case on > > i386 yet). Consequently, many failures are caused by the switch to gcc > > 4.3. > > If you determine that this failure is caused by gcc 4.3, feel free to > > downgrade this bug to 'important' if your package is only built on i386, > > and this bug is specific to gcc 4.3 (i.e the package builds fine with > > gcc 4.2). > > It looks like the FTBFS is caused by a misbehaving dpkg-source. From the > logs: > > [...] > dpkg-source: extracting libvrb in libvrb-0.5.1-4 > [...] > > According to my best knowledge, the Debian revision number should not be > part of the build directory. On my box, it works properly: > > [...] > dpkg-source: extracting libvrb in libvrb-0.5.1 > [...] > > Is it possible that dpkg used to rebuild the packages was buggy?
If your package depends on the name of the directory to be exactly the above to build correctly, then it's a bug in your package. The packaged sbuild builds packages in such directories, for example. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
