Your message dated Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable
release
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 18:30:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 11:30:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-77-228.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.77.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNEXF-0000Qc-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:30:21 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DNEXD-0001Yv-9U
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:30:19 +0200
From: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ruby1.9
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Hello,
First of all, thanks for packaging ruby1.9. I think it's nice to have
it as a Debian package, specially if it's updated regurlarly. Thanks!
Second, as I expressed in this debian-ruby post [1], I believe that a
development version of Ruby such as 1.9 should not get shipped in a
stable release.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2005/04/msg00009.html
I haven't received any feedback about that mail yet, and I was willing
to wait a little more. But since I see that the latest ruby1.9 upload
carried urgency=high, I'm preemptively filing this bug now before it
enters sarge. A memeber of the release team agreed that it was best to
file now, and discuss things after if you disagree.
akira, do you think are there any reasons for which ruby1.9 should not
be kept out of sarge?
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
Listening to: Enrique Bunbury - Sólo si me perdonas
The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple.
-- Oscar Wilde
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305065-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 09:47:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 02:47:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fs.yendot.org [164.46.240.253]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlOIY-0003ms-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:47:02 -0700
Received: from arika.org (rb.vpn.yendot.org [192.168.253.2])
by fs.yendot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E3FD36D4146; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761D3D4003;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900 (JST)
Received: from arika.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (station [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16713-06; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [172.16.1.39] (powerbk.p.arika.org [172.16.1.39])
by arika.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE7F3D4002;
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:46:57 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: akira yamada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#305065: [dummy] ruby1.9 should not be part of a stable release
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 18:47:00 +0900
To: Adeodato SimXX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at arika.org
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On 2005/04/18, at 3:30, Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 wrote:
> Package: ruby1.9
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid
> Second, as I expressed in this debian-ruby post [1], I believe that =
a
> development version of Ruby such as 1.9 should not get shipped in a
> stable release.
I close this bug because Debian/sarge released.
Thank you for your assistance :-)
--=20
akira yamada
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
