On Thursday 14 August 2008, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13 2008, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > dspam-webfrontend does not depend on apache2, it just suggests it > > (via mod-perl). It should also suggest apache2-suexec. Will there > > be an upload soon or should I do a NMU? > > I'm moving to a dependency on apache2-suexec. Is there a problem > with doing so? The intent is to have the webfrontend work out of > the box, but that depends on apache-specific configuration.
There is no problem with it. But if there are ways to use dspam-webfrontend without apache (I don't know), a recommends would be more appropriate and still make it work out of the box. > Yes, I'm about ready to ask for an upload. If Matthijs isn't > available I might ask you for help. An NMU isn't necessary and > will just clog things up, I think. My changelog so far: Lenny is frozen, the release team will never accept so many changes to go into Lenny. This means there are two ways forward: - Downgrade #488924 to non-RC severity, stay with 3.6.8-8.1 in Lenny, go ahead with your upload that changes lots of things. - Upload a new version with minimal changes fixing #488924 and possibly some other important bugs. Wait for this new version to migrate to lenny and delay the upload with big changes until later. I recommend the second option, but this is not a strong opinion. Even with the first option, it would make sense to delay the big upload, in order to be sure that no newer version is required in lenny. > The svn is at: > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-dspam > > If you'd like to try it. Further suggestions appreciated. I can't comment since I don't know or use dspam. I just want to help fixing a RC bug. If you need a sponsor to upload, ask. Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]