On 2008-08-25 23:36, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Why do I have to be on top of the list of copyright mischief?! ;)

Your name is the first in the author list :~)

> Obviously the implicit copyright "all rights reserved" would apply by default,
> but given that all contributions were explicitly published by all of the
> authors, I think that considering the work to be released into the public
> domain is a perfectly reasonable legal scenario, until decided otherwise.

You try to apply logic and common sense - but we're talking
about law - worse, copyright law.

> I hereby confirm that my edits can be distributed under the GNU General
> Public License version 2. (That was the version I used back then and
> of which I'm sure; I haven't fully investigated version 3 so I'd rather
> defer that.)

OK, given that other contributors already agreed to GPL2, too, I
drop my suggestion of GPL2 "or higher".




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to