On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Steve Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Coffman wrote:
>>> --- libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c~ 2008-08-02 10:52:00.289845221 +1200
>>> +++ libnfsidmap-0.21/libnfsidmap.c 2008-08-02 10:47:50.647889312 +1200
>>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
>>> char plgname[128];
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - snprintf(plgname, sizeof(plgname), "%s%s.so", PLUGIN_PREFIX,
>>> method);
>>> + snprintf(plgname, sizeof(plgname), "%s%s.so.0", PLUGIN_PREFIX,
>>> method);
>>>
>>> dl = dlopen(plgname, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_LOCAL);
>>> if (dl == NULL) {
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Getting back to this. I'm curious if there is a specific reason why
>> the *.so symlink was not there? Adding the ".0" shouldn't be
>> necessary. But there may be a reason for not including the .so
>> symlink that I am not aware of.
> The reason the version (or a version) number is need is because
> some distros only installed the .so with the -devel package which
> is not normally installed... The question is how do we get the
> version to change automagically when the soname changes?
>
> steved.
OK. I will add something. Maybe the patch you sent privately. I'll
look into the possibility of tying it with the autoconf stuff when the
version changes.
Also for the list: I'll move this code to a git repository next week
to make things more "open".
K.C.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
