On 13 October 2008 at 22:35, Luk Claes wrote: | Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 13 October 2008 at 20:13, Luk Claes wrote: | > | Hi | > | | > | Please prepare a targeted fix for this bug for uploading to | > | testing-proposed-updates as the current version in unstable differs too | > | much from the version in testing. | > | | > | Thanks already. | > | > There must be some misunderstanding: | > | > -- In sid, both quantlib and quantlib-swig are at version 0.9.6-1 | > | > -- In lenny, quantlib is at 0.9.0.20071224-1, quantlib-swig is at 0.9.0-1. | > This also match, I simply had an accident with ~ in the version: | > | > quantlib (0.9.0.20071224-1) unstable; urgency=low | > | > * Final release for 0.9.0 as of 2007-12-24 | > | > -- Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 24 Dec 2007 21:51:45 -0600 | > | > So both distros have both pieces matching. | | This was not at all that obvious from reading the bug log.
Sorry about that. From my vantage point (ie the per-developer overview from Debian QA) I was unaware of an open bug in t-p-u. | > The bug happened, as I recall, when quantlib-swig had gotten into unstable | > before quantlib or something like that. As far as I can tell, we really are | > fine and the bug should be closed. What remnants are you looking at in | > t-p-u? What, if anything, should get upgraded? | | I'll update the bug accordingly. Appreciate it! Thanks for keeping your eyes on the ball! Dirk -- Three out of two people have difficulties with fractions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
