On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:43:53 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:

> > Ah, fun with udev in a chroot.
> > But unconditionally calling MAKEDEV in postinst is of course no good
> > idea ...
> Couldn't you depend on makedev?

Sure, that's the other possibility, but I thought "udev | makedev"
would be more correct as udev alone creates the device anyway --
which it does, unless it runs in a chroot :)
 
> > piuparts now succeeds -- at least regarding to iodine, it is not very
> > happy about purging udev: [..]
> > But I guess there's not much I can do about it, right?
> Yeah, I'm not filing bugs about leftover files after purge anyway.
> (about 30% of the packages would be affected)

Ok, thanks.

Cheers,
gregor 
-- 
 .''`.   Home: http://info.comodo.priv.at/{,blog/} / GPG Key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   Member of VIBE!AT, SPI Inc., fellow of FSFE | http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: Joan Baez: Forever Young

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to