Thiemo Seufer scrisse:

> I can do a NMU if they are short on time. (And iff the bugs remains
> flagged as RC, as Developer's Reference 5.10.2.2 recommends.)

Sorry for not replying early on this. My intention was to wait after
lenny to fix both #500418 and 485301 at once.

While the architecture drop was just a (ugly) workaround of mine to fix
the symptoms of a toolchain bigger problem, I don't feel like an urgent
upload at this point of lenny release cycle would be justified by
the sole need of istanbul on mips* and hppa (ie. not "stricly" desktop
oriented arch) given the stability of the current version in lenny.

Please note that I'm not throwing mud at not-so-widespread arches (and
I'm with you supporting all of them) and that I'll restore them for
squeeze asap fixing the acknowledged regression; that said I wouldn't
classify this bug as RC.

I'm anyway just a man with my partial opinions, so if the release team
really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to
the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick
NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few
days).

Otherwise, if nobody speak up before 24h, I'll downgrade severity.

Ciao, Luca

-- 
 .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **  | Luca Bruno (kaeso)
: :'  :   The Universal O.S.    | lucab (AT) debian.org
`. `'`                          | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3
  `-     http://www.debian.org  | Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Attachment: pgpNd3D9UVz7z.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to