On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:44:35PM +0000, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 19:59 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > > At 1225129482 time_t, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > Maybe we could forward this bug to Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > > who is the glibc s390 maintainer and who works for IBM on the s390 Linux > > > port. > > > > Why not. > > > > Martin, do you have any clue about bug #479952? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/479952 > > This does look familiar, I've seen this some years ago with broken > locking primivites in the nptl lowlevellock implementation. Could you > check your copy of glibc to verify if the locking inline assemblies in > nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/lowlevellock.h all have the "memory" > clobber? This has been the bug last time. Just for information I'm > currently on travel and will read my mail only randomly.
They all have the memory constraint. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpFcsIlV9u29.pgp
Description: PGP signature
