Quoting James R. Van Zandt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > I have uploaded a new package with debconf support: > emacspeak_28.0-4_all.deb. I think it is working correctly. However > this is the first time I've used debconf, and I may have set some kind > of record for complexity. I'd appreciate someone checking it.
Issues: - introducing debconf templates without a prior review by debian-l10n-english is discouraged - doing this without any prior call for translations is discouraged as well. So, now, I think tha package, if you uploaded it to unstable, should enter the "Smith review process" (see the wiki.debian.org page about Smith reviews, that basically cover the above points). I would vote against the package entering lenny if that process hasn't been completed (which will require another upload once the review is done and translations are included). I can take care of the review but I really don't like doing this in a hurry....
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
