-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Joel!
> Still don't know why an upstream debian/ tree is so frowned > upon. I have no problem with upstream working on debian/ or even on with packaging being hosted upstream, I went with alioth for the sake of expediency. If you want to collaborate you can apply for access to the "collab-maint" on alioth.debian.org, or we can re-discuss hosting options - no problem. I *do* have a problem with debian/ being included in release tarballs though, it makes for messy .diff.gz if for instance files get dropped or moved around from packaging between revision 1.4.1-1 and 1.4.1-2. Also, at times there are minor differences between Ubuntu / Debian packages, and it's a shame to have to carry that around in the .diffs. Slightly off topic, Joel you might want to take a peek at svn-buildpackage (and/or git-buildpackage) if you're not familiar with them yet, they make slapping the packaging onto upstream code (and tagging package releases) a breeze. > I will say, I really like what /usr/share/cdbs does for > debian/rules. I'm pretty fond of CDBS, but I know it's not universally loved. :) Cheers, Jeremy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkknK6wACgkQ4mJJZqJp2Sd0jACgj4SXf6dYmk/qbyptj96wKZb+ K0AAoJ0c6jHE4R8wY6So2KJMSitgvOME =o/8u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
