Your message dated Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:27:15 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#491891: This package should not be released with lenny
has caused the Debian Bug report #491891,
regarding This package should not be released with lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
491891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: krecordmydesktop
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: npolsr-cleanup
I think that package krecordmydesktop should not be released with
lenny because:
* It was not released with etch, meaning that its
absence from the release most likely causes no
regressions for Debian stable users.
* It has a low popcon value, indicating that not many
people already rely on it.
* No other packages depend on it.
* It is orphaned.
My suggestions is that this package should
be removed from testing, but kept in Debian for now.
If you object to this reasoning, please speak up in the next
seven days (or better yet, adopt the package and close this
bug with your initial upload).
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[email protected]>
http://www.djpig.de/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:21:02PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Package: krecordmydesktop
> Severity: serious
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: npolsr-cleanup
>
> I think that package krecordmydesktop should not be released with
> lenny because:
>
> * It was not released with etch, meaning that its
> absence from the release most likely causes no
> regressions for Debian stable users.
> * It has a low popcon value, indicating that not many
> people already rely on it.
> * No other packages depend on it.
> * It is orphaned.
>
> My suggestions is that this package should
> be removed from testing, but kept in Debian for now.
>
> If you object to this reasoning, please speak up in the next
> seven days (or better yet, adopt the package and close this
> bug with your initial upload).
>
In the end we (yes, we =)) removed it from the archive. See #517729.
Ana
--- End Message ---
