Hello! [Tue, 19 Jul 2005] Josselin Mouette wrote: > > lam is linked statically against mpich. But libmpich++ is shipped with > > lam and lam builds and links against that. That is bad and incorrect but > > subject of another yet-to-file bug. > > Whoa ? LAM is linked against mpich ? Aren't they two independent > implementations of MPI ?
Yes. I confused it with mpich. liblammpi++ is part of lam and built
against.
> > I'm planning the NMU of lam.
>
> Thanks. I guess we also need a NMU of mpich, so that libmpich++ is
> rebuilt. Modifying mpicc.mpich to use dynamic linking would be a good
> idea as well.
Similar for lam. lam4 should be split into c++ and pure-C library packages.
But since that's mor a decision of the maintainer, I'll leave that to
him.
Robert.
--
Neutrinos are into physicists.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
