Your message dated Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:48:31 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Seems to be fixed in 1.9.12-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #473085,
regarding g-wrap - FTBFS: multiple definition of `scm_array_handle_ref'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
473085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: g-wrap
Version: 1.9.10-2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of g-wrap_1.9.10-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -I../../libffi/include -g
> -Wall -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=gnu99 -o
> libgwrap-guile-runtime.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 2:0:0 -no-undefined
> guile-runtime.lo guile-wct.lo guile-compatibility.lo
> ../../g-wrap/libgwrap-core-runtime.la -lguile -lltdl -lgmp -lcrypt -lm
> -lltdl ../../libffi/libffi.la ../../lib/libgnu.la
> cc -shared .libs/guile-runtime.o .libs/guile-wct.o
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o -Wl,--whole-archive ../../lib/.libs/libgnu.a
> -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,--rpath
> -Wl,/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10/g-wrap/.libs -Wl,--rpath
> -Wl,/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10/libffi/.libs
> ../../g-wrap/.libs/libgwrap-core-runtime.so /usr/lib/libguile.so
> /usr/lib/libgmp.so -lcrypt -lm /usr/lib/libltdl.so
> ../../libffi/.libs/libffi.so -Wl,-soname -Wl,libgwrap-guile-runtime.so.2 -o
> .libs/libgwrap-guile-runtime.so.2.0.0
> .libs/guile-wct.o: In function `scm_array_handle_ref':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:221: multiple definition of
> `scm_array_handle_ref'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:221: first defined here
> .libs/guile-wct.o: In function `scm_array_handle_set':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:236: multiple definition of
> `scm_array_handle_set'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:236: first defined here
> .libs/guile-wct.o: In function `scm_is_pair':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:250: multiple definition of `scm_is_pair'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:250: first defined here
> .libs/guile-wct.o: In function `scm_double_cell':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:146: multiple definition of `scm_double_cell'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:146: first defined here
> .libs/guile-wct.o: In function `scm_cell':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:69: multiple definition of `scm_cell'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:69: first defined here
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o: In function `scm_array_handle_ref':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:221: multiple definition of
> `scm_array_handle_ref'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:221: first defined here
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o: In function `scm_array_handle_set':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:236: multiple definition of
> `scm_array_handle_set'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:236: first defined here
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o: In function `scm_is_pair':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:250: multiple definition of `scm_is_pair'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:250: first defined here
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o: In function `scm_double_cell':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:146: multiple definition of `scm_double_cell'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:146: first defined here
> .libs/guile-compatibility.o: In function `scm_cell':
> /usr/include/libguile/inline.h:69: multiple definition of `scm_cell'
> .libs/guile-runtime.o:/usr/include/libguile/inline.h:69: first defined here
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[5]: *** [libgwrap-guile-runtime.la] Error 1
> make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10/guile/g-wrap'
> make[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10/guile/g-wrap'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10/guile'
> make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10'
> make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/g-wrap-1.9.10'
> make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> ******************************************************************************
> Build finished at 20080325-1042
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package: g-wrap
Version: 1.9.12-1
This version of the package has been sucessfully built on s390, so I
think this bug has gone away (most probably by Guile having fixed
#466778).
Regards, Rotty
--- End Message ---
