On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 10:43:36PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: Hi,
> severity 526546 serious > thanks > > Quite rude to change the severity without notifying the reporter. > > At least the error message should tell what specific feature is missing > from the arch rather than spew a generic "unspported arch" message. > Sorry, I didn't intend not to notify you (I thought the BTW sould have). That said I don't believe this is RC, as LXC never was on those architectures. I will followup with upstream regarding more architecture supports, but in the meantime what's the reason not to have this in testing, for archs in which it works? Can't we leave it "important" for now? Thanks, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
