Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:48:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320665: libbz2-1.0: Symbolic link missing in /usr/lib/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 11:16:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 04:16:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from humanoidz.org (crazy.kos.nx) [82.237.107.242]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzBo6-0000zd-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:16:38 -0700
Received: from thomas by crazy.kos.nx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DzBna-0003DW-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:16:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libbz2-1.0: Symbolic link missing in /usr/lib/
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:16:05 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libbz2-1.0
Version: 1.0.2-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I think there is a problem with libbz2-1.0. Upon installation on a
completely sane system (for example, a pbuilder environnement), the
symlink /usr/lib/libbz2.so -> /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0 is missing,
preventing the compilation of programs using libbz2.
Here is an exemple, ran inside a testing pbuilder environnement (same
problem with an unstable pbuilder environnement) :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# apt-get install libbz2-1.0
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
libbz2-dev bzip2
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libbz2-1.0
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/38.7kB of archives.
After unpacking 119kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package libbz2-1.0.
(Reading database ... 8049 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libbz2-1.0 (from .../libbz2-1.0_1.0.2-7_i386.deb) ...
Setting up libbz2-1.0 (1.0.2-7) ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cd root/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# cat > toto.c
int main(void) { return 0; }
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# gcc -o toto toto.c -lbz2
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lbz2
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Now, if I add the symlink, the application will compile:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# ln -s /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libbz2.so
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/root# gcc -o toto toto.c -lbz2
This problem is not present in my stable pbuilder environnement.
Sincerly,
Thomas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.11
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages libbz2-1.0 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
libbz2-1.0 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320665-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 11:48:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 04:48:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzCIq-0007FI-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:48:24 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 969D9171D23; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:48:24 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#320665: libbz2-1.0: Symbolic link missing in /usr/lib/
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 01:16:05PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Package: libbz2-1.0
> Version: 1.0.2-7
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> I think there is a problem with libbz2-1.0. Upon installation on a
> completely sane system (for example, a pbuilder environnement), the
> symlink /usr/lib/libbz2.so -> /usr/lib/libbz2.so.1.0 is missing,
> preventing the compilation of programs using libbz2.
No, that's what the libbz2-dev package is for.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
