Your message dated Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:01:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:36:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:36:58 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c07126a.m-kr.bostream.se (hubbe.tobbe.nu) [217.215.84.146] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BtwHf-0006l6-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:36:55 -0700
Received: by hubbe.tobbe.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 1094A34210; Mon,  9 Aug 2004 00:37:57 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Tobias Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-patch-acl: patch doesn't work on vanilla kernels.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:37:57 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-patch-acl
Version: 0.8.71-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

I tried to fit in the code but I don't know that much about the kernel source
structure, shouldn't the patch work on vanilla-kernels?

regards, Tobias Bengtsson


hubbe:/root$ tar xfj linux-2.4.25.tar.bz2 
hubbe:/root$ cd linux-2.4.25 
hubbe:/root/linux-2.4.25$ zcat
/usr/src/kernel-patches/diffs/acl/acl-2.4.25-0.8.71.diff.gz | patch -p1
--dry-run -F3 > err

err follows:

patching file Documentation/Configure.help
Hunk #2 succeeded at 16552 with fuzz 2 (offset 135 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 16572 with fuzz 3 (offset 135 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 16674 with fuzz 2 (offset 188 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 16694 with fuzz 3 (offset 188 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 17375 (offset -48 lines).
patching file arch/alpha/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/arm/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/i386/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/ia64/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/m68k/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/mips/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/mips64/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/ppc/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/ppc64/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/s390/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/s390x/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/sparc/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 3.
patching file arch/sparc64/defconfig
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
patching file fs/Config.in
Hunk #1 succeeded at 36 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 108 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 121 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 176 with fuzz 2 (offset -18 lines).
patching file fs/Makefile
Hunk #1 FAILED at 77.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/Makefile.rej
patching file fs/ext2/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 3 (offset -1 lines).
patching file fs/ext2/acl.c
patching file fs/ext2/file.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 21 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 56 with fuzz 3 (offset -1 lines).
patching file fs/ext2/ialloc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 312 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 399 (offset -6 lines).
patching file fs/ext2/inode.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1027 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1187 (offset 1 line).
patching file fs/ext2/namei.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 32 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 112 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 352 with fuzz 3 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 360 with fuzz 3 (offset -3 lines).
patching file fs/ext2/super.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 22 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 148 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 177 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 185 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 205 with fuzz 3 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 476 with fuzz 3 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 770 (offset -12 lines).
Hunk #8 FAILED at 882.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 901 with fuzz 3 (offset -13 lines).
1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/ext2/super.c.rej
patching file fs/ext3/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16 with fuzz 3 (offset -1 lines).
patching file fs/ext3/acl.c
patching file fs/ext3/file.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 130 with fuzz 3 (offset -1 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/ext3/file.c.rej
patching file fs/ext3/ialloc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 18 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 297 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 513 (offset -6 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 530 (offset -6 lines).
patching file fs/ext3/inode.c
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2195 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2390 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 2410 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 2433 (offset 2 lines).
patching file fs/ext3/namei.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 24 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 491 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1121.
1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/ext3/namei.c.rej
patching file fs/ext3/super.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 25 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 451 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 484 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 522 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 547 with fuzz 3 (offset -2 lines).
Hunk #6 FAILED at 994.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1706 (offset -16 lines).
Hunk #8 FAILED at 1893.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1911 with fuzz 3 (offset -17 lines).
2 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/ext3/super.c.rej
patching file fs/namei.c
patching file fs/nfs/dir.c
patching file fs/nfs/inode.c
patching file fs/nfsd/export.c
patching file fs/nfsd/nfs3xdr.c
patching file fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
patching file fs/nfsd/nfsxdr.c
patching file fs/nfsd/vfs.c
patching file fs/posix_acl.c
patching file fs/xattr_acl.c
patching file include/linux/ext2_acl.h
patching file include/linux/ext2_fs.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 599 (offset 23 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 614 (offset 23 lines).
patching file include/linux/ext2_fs_i.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 44 with fuzz 3 (offset -1 lines).
patching file include/linux/ext3_acl.h
patching file include/linux/ext3_fs.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 315 with fuzz 3.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 639 (offset 24 lines).
patching file include/linux/ext3_fs_i.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 52 with fuzz 3.
patching file include/linux/fs.h
patching file include/linux/nfs_mount.h
patching file include/linux/nfsd/export.h
patching file include/linux/nfsd/nfsd.h
patching file include/linux/posix_acl.h
patching file include/linux/posix_acl_xattr.h
patching file include/linux/xattr_acl.h
patching file kernel/Makefile
patching file kernel/fork.c

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages kernel-patch-acl depends on:
ii  bash                          3.0-5      The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii  grep-dctrl                    2.1.6      Grep Debian package information
ii  patch                         2.5.9-2    Apply a diff file to an original

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2005 17:01:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 10:01:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1DzdfI-0000ZS-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:01:24 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 7A07564D54; Mon,  1 Aug 2005 17:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id E1458802A; Mon,  1 Aug 2005 18:01:14 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:01:14 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

This package has been removed.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to