On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:17:30AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > But the package is not *in* etch, so the fact that it's uninstallable in > etch is not grounds for a grave bug.
sorry, i miss the reasonning. does the fact that this version is broken grounds for an open bug, or should all sid-only bugs be closed? why would it be a problem to have these bugs open until they are fixed? cheers, paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
