On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:49:13 +0200 Bertrand Marc Bertrand wrote: > I don't think you should remove /usr/lib/fglrx/diversions/libglx.so by > hand. This file belongs to xserver-xorg-core (that's why there is a > diversion).
agreed. that is just a temporary solution to get the problematic package removed. it would be a *much* better idea to backup the file, remove the package, then restore from the backup. > I think it is related to the fact that fglrx-glx.postrm > removes fglrx-driver diversions although it shouldn't. Could you test > the last revision in svn (278) ? will do. mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
