Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:15:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing linuxsampler bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2005 08:08:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 04 01:08:20 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E0am3-0001yk-00; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 01:08:20 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-108-200.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.108.200])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j7488HDX003172;
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 04:08:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E0am1-0004k4-89; Thu, 04 Aug 2005 04:08:17 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linuxsampler: Needs rebuild against new libjack
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 04:08:17 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: linuxsampler
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable
Well, actually it's not clear why it depends on libjack, since it doesn't
Build-Depend on libjack-dev....
But anyway, libjack0.80.0-0 has been removed from unstable. So it had
better stop depending on it. If it needs libjack, it should be depending
on libjack0.100.0-0.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321223-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 04:16:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 21:16:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 81-178-88-217.dsl.pipex.com (localhost.localdomain)
[81.178.88.217]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1cZs-0007QU-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:16:00 -0700
Received: from piem by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E1cZJ-0003lX-2L; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 05:15:25 +0100
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 05:15:25 +0100
From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing linuxsampler bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
hi,
Accepted 0.3.cvs20050715+3-1 in unstable (low)
sorry, i forgot to close linuxsampler bugs in the last upload...
cheers, piem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
