On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 11:36 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:56:32AM -0700, Randall Donald wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:04 +0200, Pierre Bauduin wrote: > > > > Package: nvidia-glx-ia32 > > > > Severity: serious > > > > > > > What's funny about this is you want a package to be in testing but > > > filing a RC bug just added to reasons preventing that. > > > > What does it take for non-free packages to move to testing? Is it > > automatic or not? With 2.6.30 now in testing, nvidia-glx no longer > > works in testing until we get the new version moved in. > > > The testing transition first requires a kernel module package to satisfy > the dependancy. Add to that no RC bugs. And even then some manual > trickery might be required.
I thought the excuse entry of 'section non-free/X11' might need manual intervention. So can we build and upload the kernel modules or should we bug the kernel-modules-non-free package person to add us (since that should now work)? -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
