* Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> [091029 06:21]:
> In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE was defined.
> In eglibc 2.10, getline is always defined (since it became a standard in
> POSIX2008). The problem is that your package already has a function
> named getline(), which now conflicts with glibc's. You need to rename
> your function to something else.
Actually, the problem looks a bit more complicated. The getline in
question is a replacement for systems that have no getline, and should
only be compiled if the system has none. So there must be some problem
with the detection if there is such a function.
I'll investigate, thanks for your report,
Bernhard R. Link
--
"Never contain programs so few bugs, as when no debugging tools are available!"
Niklaus Wirth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
