Your message dated Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:14:42 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#552970: libwx-perl-processstream-perl: FTBFS: Xvfb
failed to start
has caused the Debian Bug report #552970,
regarding libwx-perl-processstream-perl: FTBFS: Xvfb failed to start
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
552970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552970
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libwx-perl-processstream-perl
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: serious
User: [email protected]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/build/user-libwx-perl-processstream-perl_0.11-1-amd64-8r_Vke/libwx-perl-processstream-perl-0.11'
> cp lib/Wx/Perl/ProcessStream.pm blib/lib/Wx/Perl/ProcessStream.pm
> Manifying blib/man3/Wx::Perl::ProcessStream.3pm
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/build/user-libwx-perl-processstream-perl_0.11-1-amd64-8r_Vke/libwx-perl-processstream-perl-0.11'
> xvfb-run dh_auto_test
> Xvfb failed to start
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/10/28/libwx-perl-processstream-perl_0.11-1_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 29/10/09 at 13:01 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> tag 552970 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:49:57 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > amd64.
>
> > > xvfb-run dh_auto_test
> > > Xvfb failed to start
>
> Hm, "Xvfb failed to start" is weird but doesn't sound like a problem
> in the package; as expected it builds fine for me (both 0.11-1 and
> 0.22-1 [uploaded yesterday], on i386 and amd64, on a machine with and
> another machine without X).
probably load-induced. I've just changed my code so that retries now run
alone on the buildd. I hope it will help to get rid of all those load
problems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
