Hmm

On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 10:15:36PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Thus: What would be about the following?
> ---(patch)--------------------------------------------------------------
> --- t/MyTestSpecific.pm       (revision 46640)
> +++ t/MyTestSpecific.pm       (working copy)
> @@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
>  use GnuPG::Interface;
>  use GnuPG::Handles;
>  
> +use Any::Moose;
> +
>  use vars qw( @ISA           @EXPORT
>            $stdin         $stdout           $stderr
>            $gpg_program   $handles          $gnupg
> @@ -38,6 +40,11 @@
>             texts                  file_match
>           );
>  
> +sub BUILD {
> +    my ( $self, $args ) = @_;
> +    $self->hash_init( meta_interactive => 0 );
> +    $self->hash_init(%$args);
> +}
>  
>  for my $gpg qw(gpg gpg2) {
>      my $gpg_find = "which $gpg";
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm no this indeed will not work. I reverted my proposed patch in
SVN. I'm in contact with Jesse, the upstream maintainer, let's see if
he has some idea how this can be solved.

Bests
Salvatore

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to