Your message dated Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:39:43 +0100
with message-id <20091104113943.ga9...@xinara.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#554201: gnumeric-common:
usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency gnumeric
has caused the Debian Bug report #554201,
regarding gnumeric-common: usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency gnumeric
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
554201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554201
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gnumeric-common
Version: 1.9.14-2
Severity: serious
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency
If the package installs a symbolic link /usr/share/doc/pkg1 -> pkg2,
then pkg1 has to depend on pkg2 with the same version as pkg1.
Note, that adding the "Depends:" entry just to fix this bug is not a
good solution. It's suggested that you include a real
/usr/share/doc/pkg1 directory within pkg1 and copy the copyright file
into that directory. If the packages do not share source code, then
pkg1 should have its own copyright file (since the authors of pkg2 are
not to blame for pkg1). This bit covers meta packages as well.
Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 12.5 (Copyright information) for
details.
,----[ 12.5 Copyright information ]
| Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
| and distribution license in the file
| /usr/share/doc/package/copyright. This file must neither be compressed
| nor be a symbolic link. `
| ...
| /usr/share/doc/package may be a symbolic link to another directory in
| /usr/share/doc only if the two packages both come from the same source
| and the first package Depends on the second. These rules are important
| because copyrights must be extractable by mechanical means.
`----
This is a bug filed due to a lintian warning (see above). However,
this has also been checked manually, and thus there should be no false
positives.
Filed as serious since it is a violation of a must directive in
policy, and also since a package with these flaws will
currently get this package rejected. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg00004.html
for details. This means the package has been deemed too buggy to be in
Debian.
manoj
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.4-anzu-2 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.9.15-1
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 12:28:26 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Usertags: usr-share-doc-symlink-without-dependency
> Filed as serious since it is a violation of a must directive in
> policy, and also since a package with these flaws will
> currently get this package rejected. See
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/10/msg00004.html
> for details. This means the package has been deemed too buggy to be in
> Debian.
This is fixed in 1.9.15-1 which has been accepted.
Ray
--
UNIX is not so much a product as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history
of the hacker culture. It is our Gilgamesh epic.
Doc Searls in "The Morlock Market", Linux Journal, January 2001.
--- End Message ---
