peter green wrote: >> It looks like you forgot to really Cc them BTW? > I did but I resent the mail seperately to them afterwards.
Ah, found it. Looks like I'm not CC'ed on that anymore though. I think "it used to not work otherwise" seems like a very good reason for me to use the static lib. :-) Someone had bitlbee removed from testing now, stating eglibc migration as the reason. I wonder what that means? > What system are you getting those errors with? in my sid chroot there > doesn't seem to be any problem linking bitlbee with libresolv.so instead > of libresolv.a, doing so produces a package with a sane dependency on > libc6 and an objdump shows all those symbols being in libresolv.so and > having sane versioning. > Oh, crap. :-( I forgot to re-add -lresolv. With that, things now do work indeed. I wonder since when that is the case. I can see that at least 2.3.6.ds1-13etch9+ doesn't like this yet. That doesn't really narrow it down too much yet though. :-) But in that case, I'll just do a source NMU. I'm not sure if this actually fixes this exact problem, but at least it's more correct. Wilmer. -- +-------- .''`. - -- ---+ + - -- --- ---- ----- ------+ | wilmer : :' : gaast.net | | OSS Programmer www.bitlbee.org | | lintux `. `~' debian.org | | Full-time geek wilmer.gaast.net | +--- -- - ` ---------------+ +------ ----- ---- --- -- - +
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
