Your message dated Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320439: fixed in blitz++ 1:0.8-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jul 2005 12:41:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 29 05:41:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1DyUBD-0006IQ-00; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 05:41:35 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
        by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA23192
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:30 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D41FC3D
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
 id 13033-39 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:29 +0200 (MEST) 13975
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
        by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6TCfTre018070;
        Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:29 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:41:29 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: blas-dev and lapack-dev beeing removed from unstable, rebuild using 
atlas3 needed
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: blitz++
Severity: serious

According to 317245, the following packages are removed from unstable,
please build-depend on the appropriate atlas3 libraries.

> > atlas
> > blas
> > lapack
> > lapack99

** blitz++ has an unsatisfied build-dependency: blas-dev
** ghemical has an unsatisfied build-dependency: blas-dev
** ghemical has an unsatisfied build-dependency: lapack-dev
** python-scipy has an unsatisfied build-dependency: blas-dev

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320439-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Aug 2005 11:21:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 12 04:21:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E3XX6-00033k-00; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:17:04 -0700
From: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320439: fixed in blitz++ 1:0.8-5
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 04:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: blitz++
Source-Version: 1:0.8-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
blitz++, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

blitz++_0.8-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/b/blitz++/blitz++_0.8-5.diff.gz
blitz++_0.8-5.dsc
  to pool/main/b/blitz++/blitz++_0.8-5.dsc
blitz++_0.8-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/b/blitz++/blitz++_0.8-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated blitz++ 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:45:13 +0300
Source: blitz++
Binary: blitz++
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:0.8-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 blitz++    - C++ template class library for scientific computing
Closes: 320439
Changes: 
 blitz++ (1:0.8-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Changed build-dependency from blas-dev to atlas3-headers, as blas-dev is
     removed from the archive. (Closes: #320439)
Files: 
 1764e633682dd5c0deb5a5e2237f3922 657 devel extra blitz++_0.8-5.dsc
 ec03c2a64b2ba27b391c1babbd4768b8 3475 devel extra blitz++_0.8-5.diff.gz
 8c9c55f12613cf270d3151381e1b17a3 1389960 devel extra blitz++_0.8-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC/ID4IU9oQVFfm3QRApjXAKCAHnriH6DrInpP/5b1G2vq2CUbZQCfYpPL
J1mnfbYyAsQcTCO8uFeJ0QQ=
=K5+U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to