Hello, I just contacted upstream to check what their plan about this are. My opinion is that if they do not update it upstream, it should be removed. That would be a pity because there is no direct replacement, but anyway.
Bye, Mt. Le mardi 01 décembre 2009 à 22:46 +0000, Simon McVittie a écrit : > Package: nws > Version: 2.13-6.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: RC-buggy, extremely low popcon, no releases since 2005 > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: proposed-removal > > nws seems like a possible candidate for removal from Debian: > > * RC-buggy (runs init script without going via invoke-rc.d) > * extremely low popcon (3) > * no upstream release since 2005 > * contains a mis-packaged static library which should be in the -dev package > (I won't bother filing a separate bug for this) > > If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug, > and do an upload to fix the issues in it. > > If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands > to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nnnnnn with this bug's number: > > severity nnnnnn normal > reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org > retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons> > thanks > > For more information, see > http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals > http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt > > Regards, > smcv -- I can't believe the authors took the time to present, analyze and prove an algorithm for this middle-school problem. -- Bastard Reviewer >From Hell -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
