Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258962: fixed in ipchains 1.3.10-16
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jul 2004 12:31:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 05:31:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c186225.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.186.225] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Bjzxm-0001q4-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:31:18 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1Bjzxk-00074U-Kr; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:31:16 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 14:31:16 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: ipchains
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'ipchains' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error:

make[2]: Entering directory `/ipchains-1.3.10/libipfwc'
gcc -Wall -Wunused -O2    -c -o libipfwc.o libipfwc.c
libipfwc.c: In function `ipfwc_strerror':
libipfwc.c:504: error: label at end of compound statement
make[2]: *** [libipfwc.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/ipchains-1.3.10/libipfwc'
make[1]: *** [libipfwc/libipfwc.a] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/ipchains-1.3.10'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'ipchains' can be compiled using gcc-3.4.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/ipchains-1.3.10/libipfwc/libipfwc.c ./libipfwc/libipfwc.c
--- ../tmp-orig/ipchains-1.3.10/libipfwc/libipfwc.c     1999-03-23 
04:41:17.000000000 +0100
+++ ./libipfwc/libipfwc.c       2004-07-12 12:36:12.980655598 +0200
@@ -500,7 +500,6 @@
                                               " doesn't support"
                                               " transparent proxying?)");
                                        break;
-                               default:
                                }
                        return message;
                }

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 258962-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Aug 2005 11:08:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 13 04:08:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1E3tmA-0004mD-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:02:06 -0700
From: LENART Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#258962: fixed in ipchains 1.3.10-16
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 04:02:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

Source: ipchains
Source-Version: 1.3.10-16

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ipchains, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ipchains_1.3.10-16.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/ipchains/ipchains_1.3.10-16.diff.gz
ipchains_1.3.10-16.dsc
  to pool/main/i/ipchains/ipchains_1.3.10-16.dsc
ipchains_1.3.10-16_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/ipchains/ipchains_1.3.10-16_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
LENART Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ipchains package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 12:32:23 +0200
Source: ipchains
Binary: ipchains
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.10-16
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LENART Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: LENART Janos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ipchains   - Network firewalling for Linux 2.2.x
Closes: 157127 258962 309878 309879 322787
Changes: 
 ipchains (1.3.10-16) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fixed a gcc-3.4 bug.                            (closes: Bug#258962)
   * Removed /usr/doc symlink.                       (closes: Bug#322787)
   * Fixed manpage typos.                (closes: Bug#309878, Bug#309879)
   * Exporting ipfw(4).                              (closes: Bug#157127)
   * Fixed priority (important->optional).
   * Upgraded Standards-Version.
Files: 
 00a3dcec531fb6fa5afbc9ccc3911139 575 base optional ipchains_1.3.10-16.dsc
 c80dadcffd92655508d5cd27039742bf 23559 base optional ipchains_1.3.10-16.diff.gz
 38f245d8e999cc3c7948eeb6d881fa15 76586 base optional 
ipchains_1.3.10-16_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC/dE1efzP0rBFj00RAjl4AJ99mcvuipaxRnj65W6nFdI9u8ZFiACfda6F
t4RC2s336jMKncl4QaL5mbc=
=bnXs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to