Package: netbase
Version: 4.39
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software

The new setting breaks the webserver weborf, which listens to an ipv6 socket,
expecting to receive connections from both ipv6 and ipv4 clients.

I've read this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-de...@lists.debian.org/msg277726.html

and i've followed the link to the rfc, where i couldn't find any indication
that servers should use dual stack rather then a single ipv6 socket. I also
point out that dual stack wastes system resources.

I didn't try weborf on hurd/bsd/solaris but i did try it on OsX, and it is
able to accept connections from both ipv4 and ipv6.

Dealing with addresses like ::ffff:3.14.3.2 in the logfiles doesn't seem like
a big issue to me. In fact one would deal with only one format (ipv6) rather 
than dealing with logs containging entries with ipv4 addresses and entries with
ipv6 addresses.
Tools for scanning the logs would have to deal with only one case rather than
two different cases.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (101, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32ares (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages netbase depends on:
ii  initscripts                   2.87dsf-8  scripts for initializing and shutt
ii  lsb-base                      3.2-23     Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip

Versions of packages netbase recommends:
ii  ifupdown                      0.6.9      high level tools to configure netw

netbase suggests no packages.

-- debconf information:
  netbase/upgrade-note/etc-network-interfaces-pre-3.17-1:
  netbase/upgrade-note/init.d-split-pre-3.16-1:
  netbase/upgrade-note/radius-ports-pre-3.05:
  netbase/upgrade-note/portmap-restart-pre-3.11-2:



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to