Le Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:41:11PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:26:47PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Thanks for the NMU. I commited your changes to Debian Med SVN. BTW,
> > every DD can commit to this SVN as well - so feel free to do this in
> > some similar case at your preference.
> >
> > Kind regards and thanks for catching this
>
> Noted, thanks (I kinda wish there is a standardized way to explain this
> to NMUers ...), and thanks for having incorporated my changes this
> quick!
Hi Stefano,
I proposed debian/README.source some time ago, but it proved controversial as
debian/README.source is a README for the source package only, which excludes
the VCS that contains it:
4.14 Source package handling: debian/README.source
…
debian/README.source may also include any other information that would
be
helpful to someone modifying the source package. Even if the package
doesn't
fit the above description, maintainers are encouraged to document in a
debian/README.source file any source package with a particularly
complex or
unintuitive source layout or build system (for example, a package that
builds
the same source multiple times to generate different binary packages).
Nevertheless, if you think the idea is worth the discussion, I can transfer
it on [email protected] and propose to extend the purpose of README.source
Have a nice day,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
