tag 322089 +pending thanks It seems that the code in question needs to be somewhat rewritten sooner or later.
Meanwhile, I'll have to drop the Provides:, or so it seems. :-/
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:43:31 +0200
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>>No this is an old and deprecated API and should not be used.
> Hmm. Then which API _would_ you suggest to replace
>
> gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_issuer_dn
> gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_dn
> gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_subject_alt_name
The gnutls_x509_crt_* functions. You can check the implementation of the
gnutls_x509_extract_certificate_dn() compatibility function to see the
ones the replaced it.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
- -
Nothing is "mere". -- Richard P. Feynman, "Six Easy Pieces"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
