Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:28:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309191: Can you check this please now?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2005 12:37:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 15 05:37:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poros.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.44]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DXIN8-0007Xz-00; Sun, 15 May 2005 05:37:30 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 113FF3BC18C
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:37:00 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217])
by poros.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA2C3BC354
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:36:59 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9D71526136; Sun, 15 May 2005 14:36:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:36:59 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: caudium: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: caudium
Version: 2:1.4.5.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on a few arches (amd64,
hppa, alpha) because you're not using -fPIC to create
shared libs. This is a policy requirement (10.2).
For instance on amd64 you get:
Making PCRE
make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/src/cmods/PCRE'
/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/smartlink gcc -I/usr/include/pike/7.6.24
-I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -I/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/src/cmods/
-I/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/src/cmods/ -O2 -s
-I/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/src/cmods/PCRE/ -I. -c pcre.c -o pcre.o
/build/buildd/caudium-1.4.5.2/smartlink gcc -shared -R/usr/lib -L/usr/lib
-R/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -o PCRE.so pcre.o -lpcre
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.6/libgcc.a -lc
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.6/libgcc.a
/usr/bin/ld: pcre.o: relocation R_X86_64_32S can not be used when making a
shared object; recompile with -fPIC
pcre.o: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[4]: *** [PCRE.so] Error 1
You get something simular on hppa, and alpha fails on the
next lib.
Kurt
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 309191-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 13:28:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 06:28:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adicia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4f1H-000225-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 06:28:52 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP
id 1DDE84437F; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:28:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by adicia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CCC73441DA; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:28:50 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 51CD326136; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:28:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:28:50 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#309191: Can you check this please now?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 2:1.4.7-3
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:45:26AM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> Hello Kurt,
>
> Since the autobuilders haven't been able to build past few versions of
> Pike (due to missing dependencies) could you, please, compile caudium by
> hand on your amd64 machine (I assume you have access to one) and let me know
> whether the bug is gone so that I can close it? Looking at the 64 bit
> architectures that built caudium recently, it should be gone, but since your
> original report referred to amd64, I need a confirmation that it's gone
> there as well before closing it,
wanna-build -i caudium
caudium:
Package : caudium
Version : 2:1.4.7-3
State : Installed
Installed-Version : 2:1.4.7-3
Previous-State : unknown
State-Change : 2005 Aug 14 03:18:04
So I'm closing it.
PS: Don't upload a package to try to get it build, the buildd
admins will requeue it when they think it's ready to be build.
Setting urgency high will not make it build faster and only has
effect on the delay for getting into testing.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
