Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:03:34 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Package removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #559251,
regarding libroxen-adbanner: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
559251: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559251
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libroxen-adbanner
Version: 0.14-7
Severity: serious
Justification: RC-buggy, extremely low popcon, orphaned
User: [email protected]
Usertags: proposed-removal
libroxen-adbanner seems like a good candidate for removal from Debian:
* RC-buggy (files in /var/www)
* extremely low popcon (inst=1)
* orphaned due to inactive maintainer
If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please just close this bug,
and do an upload to fix the issues in it.
If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands
to [email protected], replacing nnnnnn with this bug's number:
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
thanks
For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
Regards,
smcv
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.14-7+rm
Package removed from Debian unstable: http://bugs.debian.org/566412
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
--- End Message ---
