On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 04:16:28PM +0200, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
> (If you're in a hurry, you might want to skip to the end of the mail, since
> the conclusion is partly unrelated to my in-depth analysis of the problem)

Hey Matthijs, thanks a lot for your in depth investigation!

> So, it turns out we can easily fix this problem by packaging the latest
> version of the php documentation. Considering that we're currently shipping a
> version from 2008, that seems like a good idea anyway.

Agreed. My previous comment on that was however that to properly package
new upstream we should additionally package the latest PhD which, IMHO,
deserves to be in a separate (and hence NEW) package. If the maintainer
is willing to go that way, I believe it would be the most appropriate
solution. Unfortunately, I've thus far been unable to get any answer
whatsoever on the matter from Lior.

An alternative path can be to try backporting the upstream fix to the
current version of the package in sid, adding the needed xmlns=
attribute where needed.

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..|  .  |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to