Hi! I'm CCing the maintainers of mozilla-devscripts, as they should decide how to proceed.
Am 2010-06-07 13:00, schrieb Nacho Barrientos Arias: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Willi Mann <wi...@wm1.at> wrote: >>> Thanks. >>> >>> RDFLib 3.0.0 was recently released. Thus, before uploading a patched >>> debian/rules, I'd like to test whether this issue is reproducible with >>> the new version as well. I'm preparing a package, it would be great if >>> you could test it on your mipsel virtual machine. Give me some time, >>> you will have it in your inbox shortly. >> >> Yes, of course. > > The package is almost ready but we're in serious trouble now. > > RDFLib 3.0.0 does not ship C extensions so this bug is not > reproducible any longer. > > BUT we have a bigger problem now: support for graph querying using > SPARQL has been dropped. This means that your test case won't work > and, even worse, that enigmail installation (and maybe others) will > fail now on every architecture (*sigh*). Applies to all packages using /usr/bin/install-xpi, an that's quite a lot. > http://paste.debian.net/76438/ > > Look at this: http://code.google.com/p/rdflib/wiki/IntroSparql > > In short, Rdfextras must be packaged for Debian if you want RDFLib to > dispatch SPARQL queries. Any volunteers? How many users rely on the extension? In case the number is low, it's probably better to work around the problem. mozilla-devscripts maintainers, would it be possible to use python-librdf instead of python-rdflib to do the queries on install.rdf? WM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org