On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:02:30AM +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > Basically, this package should not have been allowed into unstable and is > already of questionable use for Debian at this point, given Debian's > extremely limitted LSB support. As such, I demand that it be > immediately removed from the archive; if it ever gets reintroduced, it > should first go to and be thoroughly tested via experimental. Thanks!
Er, there is nothing "limited" about Debian's support for LSB init scripts. You (and the maintainer of this package) seem to be making the error of thinking that LSB support imposes requirements on how an LSB-compliant OS manages its *own* init scripts. It does not -- it only specifies the features that an LSB-compliant OS must make available for use by an LSB init script. So yes, if insserv assumes that all Debian initscripts are LSB init scripts, it is fundamentally broken. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
