On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 10:11:10PM +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 01:15:06AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Hi! > > > > [ Removing #516057 as it's a closed bug about a bison error. ] > > > > On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 18:19:51 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > > Can you please have a look at fixing the segfaults of iasl on non > > > i386/amd64 or do you think it would be better to remove the support of > > > iasl on non i386/amd64. If so, bochs is the only affected reverse dep of > > > iasl if you would restrict iasl to i386/amd64. > > > > I don't see why iasl would not be able to run on any architecture, > > it's just a compiler for byte-code. We ported it some time ago, but > > it seems it has regressed in the latest upload (probably problems with > > unaligned accesses or little endian assumptions, as before).
I uploaded a new package with a pile of fixes for BE support. Let's see how it goes. -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
