On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:15:34AM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 06:04:51PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's been my experience with this kind of ABI breakage that the only
> > good way out is through.  If upstream has not been responsive to the
> > need to change the soname in response to the ABI changes, then I would
> > at least recommend changing the library package name to something like
> > libmagick6debian1 so that this can be sorted out within the Debian
> > package dependencies in unstable while we're waiting.

> I've just gotten a response from upstream that they're going to bump the
> soname in the upcoming release 6.2.4-4 which is due in the next days.
> (And in terms of imagemagick release frequency, days usually really
> means days and not weeks.) Given that the breakage must have been around
> since the beginning of June, we can probably afford to wait these extra
> days before starting to pull Debian-specific stunts, I think.

Ok, great to hear.

> The cleanup work won't be any less anyway. Unfortunately, introducing
> the bumped soname means we'll be adding yet another transition to the
> pile.

Yeah, but you definitely have priority here given that the ABI has
already been broken for a while.  Anyway, it looks like this one is
going to be tied up with both the KDE and the libsnmp transitions.
Should be fun. :)

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to