Moin Steve! Steve Langasek schrieb am Donnerstag, den 01. September 2005: > > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.0.0), libxrender-dev, imlib11-dev, > > libgnome2-dev, libgnome-desktop-dev, gettext, xutils, libxft-dev (>> 2.1.1) > > | libxft2-dev, dpatch, libesd0-dev, libpng12-dev, libxinerama-dev [i386 > > ia64 powerpc] > > +Build-Depends: debhelper, libxpm-dev, libxrandr-dev, libxrender-dev, > > imlib11-dev, libgnome2-dev, libgnome-desktop-dev, gettext, xutils, > > libxft-dev (>> 2.1.1) | libxft2-dev, dpatch, libesd0-dev, libpng12-dev, > > libxinerama-dev [amd64 i386 ia64 powerpc ppc64]
Hm, sparc is missing too. > > Build-Conflicts: libttf-dev > > Standards-Version: 3.6.2.1 > > This bug is a duplicate of bug #319311, and this patch is wrong. > > - there is nothing architecture-specific about the libxinerama-dev > build-dependency; you should not extend this brokenness with further > enumeration of architectures Ehm, what about not beeing available on any arch but the listed ones? Or maybe I am missing something in debian/pool/main/x/xorg-x11/. > - nothing in the quoted error gives any reason why libxpm-dev and > libxrandr-dev should be added as build-dependencies. I think I should go back to the single xlibs-dev dependency again, that has always guaranteed correct package set before. Regards, Eduard. -- <stockholm> Overfiend: why dont you flame him? you are good at that. <Overfiend> I have too much else to do. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
