Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325841: fixed in ginac 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Aug 2005 09:56:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 31 02:56:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) 
[66.93.39.86] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EAPKD-0008LQ-00; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:56:09 -0700
Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1003)
        id C5D847049; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:56:07 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ginac_1.3.2-1 (ia64/unstable): FTBFS: no matching function for call to 
'GiNaC::registered_class_options::print_func(void (GiNaC::add::*)(const 
GiNaC::print_context&, unsigned int)const)'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: ginac
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Hi Richard,

ginac is failing to build on ia64 with an error unrelated to bug
#325837:

[...]
 g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -g -Wall -O2 -finline-limit=3D1200 -MT ad=
d.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/add.Tpo -c add.cpp  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/add.o
basic.h:85: warning: 'struct GiNaC::map_function' has virtual functions but=
 non-virtual destructor
basic.h:104: warning: 'class GiNaC::basic::visitor' has virtual functions b=
ut non-virtual destructor
ex.h:878: warning: 'class GiNaC::pointer_to_map_function' has virtual funct=
ions but non-virtual destructor
numeric.h:80: warning: 'class GiNaC::numeric::visitor' has virtual function=
s but non-virtual destructor
expairseq.h:67: warning: 'class GiNaC::expairseq::visitor' has virtual func=
tions but non-virtual destructor
add.h:33: warning: 'class GiNaC::add::visitor' has virtual functions but no=
n-virtual destructor
mul.h:33: warning: 'class GiNaC::mul::visitor' has virtual functions but no=
n-virtual destructor
matrix.h:95: warning: 'class GiNaC::matrix::visitor' has virtual functions =
but non-virtual destructor
add.cpp:35: error: no matching function for call to 'GiNaC::registered_clas=
s_options::print_func(void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::print_context&, uns=
igned int)const)'
registrar.h:73: note: candidates are: GiNaC::registered_class_options& GiNa=
C::registered_class_options::print_func(const GiNaC::print_functor&) [with =
Ctx =3D GiNaC::print_context]
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::add::do_prin=
t_latex', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::pri=
nt_latex&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::add::do_prin=
t_csrc', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::prin=
t_csrc&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::expairseq::d=
o_print_tree', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::expairseq::*)(const=
 GiNaC::print_tree&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before '(' token
add.cpp:35: error: no matching function for call to 'GiNaC::registered_clas=
s_options::print_func(void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::print_context&, uns=
igned int)const)'
registrar.h:73: note: candidates are: GiNaC::registered_class_options& GiNa=
C::registered_class_options::print_func(const GiNaC::print_functor&) [with =
Ctx =3D GiNaC::print_context]
add.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::add::do_prin=
t_latex', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::pri=
nt_latex&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::add::do_prin=
t_csrc', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::add::*)(const GiNaC::prin=
t_csrc&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
add.cpp:35: error: request for member 'print_func' in '&GiNaC::expairseq::d=
o_print_tree', which is of non-class type 'void (GiNaC::expairseq::*)(const=
 GiNaC::print_tree&, unsigned int)const'
add.cpp:35: error: expected primary-expression before '>' token
add.cpp: In member function 'virtual GiNaC::ex GiNaC::add::conjugate() cons=
t':
add.cpp:388: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expres=
sions
make[3]: *** [add.lo] Error 1
[...]

A full build log can be found at
<http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=3Dginac&ver=3D1.3.2-1&arch=3Dia64&=
stamp=3D1124523810&file=3Dlog&as=3Draw>.

This looks like a cascading failure, but I don't really know what the
first failure means in this case, as I don't understand the code well
enough to know why it works on the *other* architectures. :)

--=20
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                   http://www.debian.org/

--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDFX63KN6ufymYLloRAkshAJ9r00HdKCHd4HNc3fKn8AxAULAFyQCfbEj6
5t7ezEzmXM8qg4qsuGwM5h0=
=ARfM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wzJLGUyc3ArbnUjN--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 325841-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 21:12:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 14:12:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EAwCP-0005Tq-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:17 -0700
From: Richard Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#325841: fixed in ginac 1.3.2-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 14:02:17 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ginac
Source-Version: 1.3.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ginac, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ginac-tools_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/ginac/ginac-tools_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
ginac_1.3.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/ginac/ginac_1.3.2-2.diff.gz
ginac_1.3.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/ginac/ginac_1.3.2-2.dsc
libginac-dev_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/ginac/libginac-dev_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
libginac1.3c2-dbg_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/ginac/libginac1.3c2-dbg_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
libginac1.3c2_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/ginac/libginac1.3c2_1.3.2-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Richard Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ginac package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu,  1 Sep 2005 21:55:47 +0200
Source: ginac
Binary: libginac1.3c2 libginac1.3c2-dbg ginac-tools libginac-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Richard Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Richard Kreckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 ginac-tools - Some tools for the GiNaC framework
 libginac-dev - The GiNaC framework (development files)
 libginac1.3c2 - The GiNaC framework (runtime library)
 libginac1.3c2-dbg - The GiNaC framework (debugging symbols)
Closes: 325841
Changes: 
 ginac (1.3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adjusted to Standards-Version 3.6.2.
   * Add a patch to ginac/print.h for g++-4.0.2; closes: #325841.
Files: 
 4bac44855c4969bd940fb97f44551158 683 math optional ginac_1.3.2-2.dsc
 784028a5b5e144a4ac350852b2ce6a79 4601 math optional ginac_1.3.2-2.diff.gz
 98212d804974709d9352118bed176ff7 841154 libs optional 
libginac1.3c2_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
 c98e4bd4d34f52666d62bb9a5fbb6f39 1628654 libdevel optional 
libginac-dev_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
 b0517ba899b90b14a6fc97f955410007 95540 math optional 
ginac-tools_1.3.2-2_i386.deb
 deb284158b46c9ce5250d098056c1d65 3284232 libdevel optional 
libginac1.3c2-dbg_1.3.2-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDF19NXY7lDPAZkWIRAotIAJ9BkA5LG1CL6baKfpAhCChaWRPC7wCdFBpX
rW2f9I0vFCeGwfm777FmweY=
=O1p8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to