Your message dated Sat, 03 Sep 2005 13:32:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326420: fixed in jwm 0.23-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2005 05:53:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 02 22:53:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c173118.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.173.118]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBQyD-0006cA-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:53:41 -0700
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EBQyB-0001tY-Kz; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 07:53:39 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: jwm: FTBFS (amd64): conflicting types for 'GetWindowAtom'
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 07:53:39 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: jwm
Version: 0.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'jwm' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -c -O2 -Wall -g -O2 hint.c
hint.c:531: error: conflicting types for 'GetWindowAtom'
hint.h:32: error: previous declaration of 'GetWindowAtom' was here
make[2]: *** [hint.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/jwm-0.23/src'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/jwm-0.23'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
With the attached patch 'jwm' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/jwm-0.23/src/hint.c ./src/hint.c
--- ../tmp-orig/jwm-0.23/src/hint.c 2005-05-23 23:02:41.000000000 +0000
+++ ./src/hint.c 2005-09-03 05:46:09.000000000 +0000
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
/****************************************************************************
****************************************************************************/
-int GetWindowAtom(Window window, AtomType atom, CARD32 *value) {
+int GetWindowAtom(Window window, AtomType atom, Window *value) {
unsigned long count;
int status;
unsigned long extra;
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326420-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2005 20:39:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 03 13:39:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EBegX-0006MY-00; Sat, 03 Sep 2005 13:32:21 -0700
From: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326420: fixed in jwm 0.23-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 13:32:21 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: jwm
Source-Version: 0.23-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jwm, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
jwm_0.23-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/j/jwm/jwm_0.23-2.diff.gz
jwm_0.23-2.dsc
to pool/main/j/jwm/jwm_0.23-2.dsc
jwm_0.23-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/j/jwm/jwm_0.23-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated jwm package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2005 14:02:01 +0300
Source: jwm
Binary: jwm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.23-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
jwm - Very small lightweight pure X11 window manager with tray and menu
Closes: 326420
Changes:
jwm (0.23-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Closes: #326420 (serious). amd64/unstable compile error fix.
src/hint.c::GetWindowAtom() arg: CARD32 *value => Window *value.
Patch thanks to Andreas Jochens < aj andaco de>
* Sent notification to upstream about rest of the compiler warnings.
* debian/copyright: Updated new FSF address
* Renamed debian/TODO.Debian => debian/TODO due to dh_installdocs(1).
* Svn revision: 12,13,14,15,16
* debian/control: Added "Provides: x-window-manager". See Debian Policy
Manual Chapter 11 - Customized programs: 11.8.3 Packages providing a
terminal emulator. See also 7.4 Virtual packages - Provides.
* debian/jwm.postinst: Register /etc/alternatives with priority 20.
* debian/jwm.prerm: New file. Unregister /etc/alternatives
* Svn revision 11
Files:
f712caecb0e56381fd9319b2345e89b6 638 x11 optional jwm_0.23-2.dsc
4281d12d8a60d01ba8841550aae4f676 28844 x11 optional jwm_0.23-2.diff.gz
967b261c8c8b322248403f8a71f50a70 57726 x11 optional jwm_0.23-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDGgV2mBxf18ZxJX0RAkbFAJ9QOJ3C4+W0qxMw6xQv6EjpFbx77gCgxKgI
Jiug3d9XBUEQiXM2hzhdEdQ=
=QKi5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
