Your message dated Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:06:36 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Actually, no bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #592265,
regarding Causes FTBFS of other packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
592265: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: javahelper
Version: 0.32
Severity: grave

Despite what the man page says, you can't call jar -u -f -m you have to use ufm 
for sun jar. 
This bug will cause javahelper-using packages to FTBFS.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages javahelper depends on:
ii  bsdmainutils                  8.0.11     collection of more utilities from 
ii  dctrl-tools                   2.14       Command-line tools to process Debi
ii  debhelper                     7.4.20     helper programs for debian/rules
ii  devscripts                    2.10.64    scripts to make the life of a Debi
ii  dpkg-dev                      1.15.7.2   Debian package development tools
ii  libarchive-zip-perl           1.30-2     Perl module for manipulation of ZI

javahelper recommends no packages.

Versions of packages javahelper suggests:
ii  cvs                         1:1.12.13-12 Concurrent Versions System
pn  gawk                        <none>       (no description available)
pn  tofrodos                    <none>       (no description available)

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On further inspection, I forgot to commit the broken change before uploading 
it, so the bug isn't in the archive. Woo... I guess

Matt

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to