Your message dated Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:37:08 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no longer relevant
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Jul 2005 07:50:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 06 00:50:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from levallois-1-81-57-180-153.fbx.proxad.net (localhost.localdomain)
[81.57.180.153]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dq4fX-0007CF-00; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 00:50:07 -0700
Received: from encolpe by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1Dq4fR-0002y2-C7; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:50:01 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Encolpe DEGOUTE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ndiswrapper-source: binary-modules compilation use the wrong gcc
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 09:50:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ndiswrapper-source
Version: 1.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After compilation and installation, module instertion gives this message
in syslog:
Jul 6 09:45:42 localhost vmunix: ndiswrapper: version magic '2.6.11-1-686 686
gcc-4.0' should be '2.6.11-1-686 686 gcc-3.3'
Perhaps a CC=gcc-3.3 in the Makefile will fix that.
The bug is present upstream.
Regards,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages ndiswrapper-source depends on:
ii bzip2 1.0.2-7 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debhelper 4.9.3 helper programs for debian/rules
ii gcc 4:4.0.0-1 The GNU C compiler
ii module-assistant 0.9.3 tool to make module package creati
ndiswrapper-source recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 317092-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 05:36:47 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 04 22:36:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from faye.voxel.net [69.9.164.210] (0579060c36f0d73fd9c85930f7384e4d)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EC9ex-0002hf-00; Sun, 04 Sep 2005 22:36:47 -0700
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-66-30-11-233.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [66.30.11.233])
by faye.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF6E36CDA
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 01:36:46 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: no longer relevant
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+W0W0tWpELDmdv+HQ5QX"
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:37:08 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-+W0W0tWpELDmdv+HQ5QX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This bug is no longer relevant, now that both kernels and ndiswrapper
(in sid) are built with gcc-4.0. Unfortunately, there's no real gcc
transition plans for kernel modules (and kernels); we're currently
trying to figure out the best way to handle module rebuilds and such.
Thanks for the report.
--=20
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-+W0W0tWpELDmdv+HQ5QX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDG9mE78o9R9NraMQRAqW3AJ9IG1SEdrAivh2k71Wsv7s6j45dwACgsoqb
KNBQe6Oqe2UlAj7kHJsXT94=
=T8F+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-+W0W0tWpELDmdv+HQ5QX--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
