Your message dated Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#316265: fixed in xosview 1.8.2-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2005 18:53:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 29 11:53:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dnhgz-0000Zc-00; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:53:49 -0700
Received: from renig.nat.blars.org (plergb.nat.blars.org [172.16.1.1])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
j5TIrkKf017968
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:53:46 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j5TIrkWM017966;
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:53:46 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xosview: ftbfs [sparc] sys/io.h: No such file or directory
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:53:46 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xosview
Version: 1.8.2-6
Severity: serious
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
The sparc buildd failed to build this package due to a g++ error.
Many packages that attepmted buidling on that day had gcc problems, so
this looks like a gcc version or buildd problem.
On my sparc pbuilder I got:
g++ -W -Wall -O2 -I. -DXOSVIEW_VERSION=\"1.8.2\" -I/tmp/buildd/xosview-1.8.2
-I/tmp/buildd/xosview-1.8.2/linux -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\"
-DHAVE_BOOL=1 -DLONG_LONG=long\ long -DHAVE_SNPRINTF=1 -DHAVE_IOSTREAM=1
-DHAVE_FSTREAM=1 -DHAVE_XPM=1 -DGNULIBC=1 -DUSESYSCALLS=1 -DHAVE_USLEEP=1 -I..
-c serialmeter.cc -o serialmeter.o
serialmeter.cc:36:20: sys/io.h: No such file or directory
serialmeter.cc: In member function `bool SerialMeter::getport(short unsigned
int)':
serialmeter.cc:78: warning: unused parameter `short unsigned int port'
make[2]: *** [serialmeter.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xosview-1.8.2/linux'
make[1]: *** [meterlib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xosview-1.8.2'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316265-close) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Sep 2005 18:38:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 11:38:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECLlF-0002vE-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:32:05 -0700
From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#316265: fixed in xosview 1.8.2-7
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 11:32:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xosview
Source-Version: 1.8.2-7
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xosview, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xosview_1.8.2-7.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xosview/xosview_1.8.2-7.diff.gz
xosview_1.8.2-7.dsc
to pool/main/x/xosview/xosview_1.8.2-7.dsc
xosview_1.8.2-7_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xosview/xosview_1.8.2-7_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xosview package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:08:19 -0500
Source: xosview
Binary: xosview
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.8.2-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xosview - X based system monitor
Closes: 316265
Changes:
xosview (1.8.2-7) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Acknowledged NMU for 316265 - Shame on me, looks dead simple! :-(
Thanks, Blars (Closes: #316265)
* Moved the Xdefaults out of /usr/share/doc to leave only one instance
in /etc/x11/app-defaults - What were they doing there in the first
place?
* Added the .stipple XDefaults to the end of the main file, documented
it in the man page
Files:
0f51b7940c5e7c5b73c5166ed253162c 595 utils optional xosview_1.8.2-7.dsc
88f52cb45ad6be5c86278a5d18993e2f 54128 utils optional xosview_1.8.2-7.diff.gz
74e0ad0821dd7b01c7d063eb47cff59b 84396 utils optional xosview_1.8.2-7_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDHHwX2A7zWou1J68RAmpEAJ49dwqQLoPFz2BoQQGdnZ8SDoW95gCgm0hn
SH1+UB04oUE708buUAljK7s=
=G4io
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
