reopen 603677 thanks
>> If I'm wrong, explain me. JC> Oh ffs, did you even read what that bug was about? Oh ffs, did *you* even read what that bug was about? :) JC> libidn11 had wrong shlibs, it is wrong it *has* wrong shlibs, *now*. So I think that closing the bug - Your mistake. I agree that buildd server might hasn't compiled it yet, or the other cause is exists, but *now* debian's repo contain packages in inconsistent state. Closing the bug violates p. 3 of "Social Contract": =quote # We will not hide problems We will keep our entire bug report database open for public view at all times. Reports that people file online will promptly become visible to others. =cut We *have* the problem, *now*. Resolve this problem and *then* close the bug. Now we have *freeze* squeeze state, so each RC bug has large value. -- ... mpd is off . ''`. Dmitry E. Oboukhov : :’ : email: un...@debian.org jabber://un...@uvw.ru `. `~’ GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21 `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555 E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
